Carta Collective

 View Only

Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

  • 1.  Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:01

    Hi everyone,

    My name is Alex King, and I'm the founder of Archetype Legal, PC (www.archetypelegal.com). My firm serves entrepreneurs, startups, and small businesses as they grow and evolve. We believe the practice of law can be completed with a three-step approach: transparency, philanthropy, and sophistication. I'm excited to talk to you about raising capital for your business and share some insights that might help you get a leg up.

    QUICK DISCLAIMER: This is a rapid-fire response, and my feedback and comments below are intended to be high-level thoughts without evaluating things like your corporate governance documents or having an opportunity to dive below the service and really know what is going on. Thus, no one who reads my feedback and comments should act or refrain from acting solely on what you read below. You are STRONGLY encouraged to speak with an attorney familiar with startups who can give you convicted advice.

    With that as a backdrop, let's kick things off with a few questions that came in before this live chat started.



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:06

    Thanks, Alex!  Appreciate your time today to answer our questions.  How does this typically work?  Are the questions replies right to this thread and we need to keep refreshing our screen to see the Q&A?



    ------------------------------
    Jerry Levin
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:07

    Yep! Questions and replies will be right here in this thread. You'll want to refresh to see the newest comments coming in. 



    ------------------------------
    Brent Devey
    Community Manager
    Carta
    Salt Lake City UT
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:08

    @Jerry Levin

    Hopefully, @Brent Devey will set me straight if I start doing this incorrectly, but I believe everything will be handled in this thread. I'll be addressing your question shortly.



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:07

    @Nicholas Eskelinen asked this question.

    "I have a question for Alex:

    We are a pre-seed startup looking to raise capital to get us through launch. We have a deep-pocketed acquaintance who has signaled they are interested in contributing a significant amount in exchange for equity (let's say $500K for 10%). They are not interested in using a SAFE or convertible debt and are OK with all of the equity being issued from Common Shares. This is a great problem to have, of course, but I'm concerned that this could adversely affect our 409A valuation when we go to issue options for our first round of hires.

    Hi Nico,

    Your concerns are legitimate, and I don't have a magic fix. If a third party is willing to value your company at $5m ($500k for 10%), the 409A will consider the investor's common stock purchase. While I cannot promise this, the 409A may come in lower than $5m due to things such as discounts for lack of a controlling interest and market conditions. Still, you should expect it won't come back at $0.001 per share or anything close to that if you sell just standard common stock at a $5m valuation.

    One potential solution would be to explore selling this investor series seed preferred (www.seriesseed.com). Unlike the NVCA model documents used in a Series A and beyond, the series seed preferred open source templates have fewer bells and whistles (read, much cheaper to execute from a legal fees perspective :] ) and contemplate investment amounts in the $500k-$1.5m range. Therefore, if you sell the series seed at $0.50 per share (just an example based on 10m shares and $5m valuation), it's reasonable that the 409A will come in a 50-80% discount and settle close to $0.10-20 per share. That's still higher than fractions of a penny, or sub $0.10 per share, but it would hopefully lower it significantly below the investor's price per share. However, it's still a class of preferred stock with some voting protection rights and a liquidation preference. Indeed, there are tradeoffs, as you've now sold preferred stock with preferential rights, but it could help.

    Assuming you cannot talk them into a SAFE/Convertible Note, the other option is to ensure all key insiders have their shares in place before closing the round with this acquaintance. Downstream team members will have to live with the elevated price, but you can solidify most of your core team members early on; it will lower the pain for the critical talent you need to attract upfront.



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:08

    Hi Alex,

    first-time founder here, having first-time raise conversations with angels and pre-seed VCs for my IoT venture (Delaware C-corp).

    Next to the data room I'm preparing (not much in it, very early stage), what docs and tactics should I have ready at hand?

    Say I have a great pitch and an angel comes up interested, gives me their biz card and says "contact me". Next to my own due diligence on that angel, what docs and tools should I really have ready to go and take with me in that follow up?

    Apologies for the reductive scenario, plenty of what-ifs.

    Thanks!



    ------------------------------
    Bodo Voet
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:12

    Can't login.  Link just brings me back in a circle.  What am I missing???



    ------------------------------
    Charles Fritschler
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:14

    Hi @Charles Fritschler! The event is hosted right here on this thread. There is no video component, but rather questions are asked and answered here in the comment section asynchronously. You're in the right place!



    ------------------------------
    Brent Devey
    Community Manager
    Carta
    Salt Lake City UT
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:31

    Hi @Bodo Voet

    You're ahead of the game by already worrying about a data room. Far too often, we see clients neglect corporate records and then have to scramble once they have a lead investor. I'll be sharing something I wrote in advance about mistakes I typically see startups make, so be on the lookout for that post.

    In the meantime, in line with a data room, having all of your ducks in a row with legal compliance and corporate records is incredibly valuable. If you've got that set, you're spot on that you need to have a solid pitch. As the saying goes, you only get one chance to make a good impression. The good news here is you may have a soft initial landing if you're going for a seed round. Most early-stage seed rounds use a SAFE or convertible note, as the SAFE title indicates (a "Simple Agreement for Future Equity"); most investors are not looking to perform extensive due diligence and will be more influenced by your pitch or product/service. While I recommend using an attorney for the seed round, after the funds come in, you may have a second to breathe and now have the capital to invest money in an attorney, CPA, and other professionals to help guide the business.

    As mentioned in my recent post to @Jerry Levin, before you take on any capital, it's wise to ensure all early insiders (i.e., founders) and critical talent have their stock issued. The plan is that the company will only increase in value from here, and far too often, we've seen startups verbally promise equity to key talent, never follow through on it, and then try and clean stuff up after the capital raise. Trying to button up promised equity after a capital raise is never fun and almost always ensures the talent will have a worse deal than had the startup granted him/her equity when it originally promised to do so. Obviously, you will use the capital you raise to hire people, so I am not saying you need to assemble a team of 50 before you ever raise a dollar, but if there are a handful of key players, make sure the equity paperwork is buttoned up.

    Finally, investors will impressed if you've thought multiple moves ahead and already have a rough pro forma calculating how you plan to raise both now and in the years ahead. Showing a road map will instill faith that you have a plan to intend to execute. As I will mention in another post, telling your story is crucial, and resources such as Potential.AI can help ensure you put your best foot forward. You can learn more at (www.potential.ai) or by contacting a fellow Carta Collective member @Rachel Weissman.

    -Alex

    alex@archetypelegal.com



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 10.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:13

    Is it advisable for a company selling a consumer product via eCommerce  (in our case CBD infused Columbian coffee) to establish traction (sales) and a substantial subscriber base of consumers prior to performing a Reg CF via a SAFE?  Most of the portals for capital raises such as StartEngine and WeFunder do not engage their investors until a company has raised between $250K to $500K from their own investors.  Your comments?



    ------------------------------
    Ralph Amato
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:40

    Hi @Ralph Amato

    If you prove that your product has traction, that will go a long way toward accelerating the capital raise. I recently advised an eco-friendly soap company on a raise, and they were able to land investors with relative ease because they were already in the market (self-funded initially by founders who had previous exits) and could prove customers were excited about their brand.

    As you note, portals will often want to see you've been able to raise capital, and as mentioned above, proving that sales are already achievable will help you land capital. That said, we have a product-based client who raised $10+m before going to market. They were able to do so because their product was completely unique and required a lot of research and development before it could be sold. Thus, a lot of this comes down to whether your IP and product are unique, which could influence funding. If I am inventing a new form of bicycle, I can get funds to help create it. However, if I am selling a standard bicycle like everyone else, showing I can sell bicycles goes a long way to generating interest that I am worth investing in.

    -Alex

    alex@archetypelegal.com



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 12.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:17

    @Jerry Levin asked:

    We are a medical device pre-seed startup (incorporated, but need to draft governance docs including stock purchase agreement and equity incentive plan) with about $300k of prospective Safe investors lined up once we formalize that process.  The question relates to equity for our initial team.  There are 2 primary Founders and 3 people who have been involved from early planning days and will likely be considered much smaller Co-Founders  but will need to provide ongoing services to the Company to support the initial equity grant.

    We are contemplating  Founder Shares + ~20% incentive pool (EIP) pre Safes.  All shares will need a vesting schedule, including Founder shares.  But... would you consider including the 3 smaller Co-Founders in Founder Shares or in the EIP?  If in the EIP, it seems like they will eat up a decent amount of the 20%.  Are Founder Shares typically structured with different terms than EIP shares?

    Thanks for any insights that you can provide!

    Hi Jerry,

    It's important to note that founder is just a word we use to designate someone who is there at the beginning. Unlike the term "employee" or "consultant," the word "founder" does not have a legal definition. Thus, assuming you're using "founders shares" to simply mean standard common stock (same class held by the EIP and not a class with, say 10x voting rights), then a standard approach would be to issue the smaller co-founders restricted stock purchase agreements with a vesting schedule similar to the two primary founders. The smaller co-founders' shares would also come out of the roughly 80% that are divided among all of the founders (both primary and smaller founders).

    Founder's shares are typically different in that they are purchased for a nominal price ($0.0001 per share) and then subject to a vesting schedule whereby the company can repurchase those unvested shares for the same purchase price if a founder leaves. Individuals who receive from the equity incentive plan typically receive stock options and must vest into those shares before they have the ability to buy those shares at the strike price set by the 409A valuation. Both founders and recipients from the EIP are on a vesting schedule, but what varies is that founders typically do not receive stock options, whereas new hires and advisors do.

    Whenever you issue a "security," you must consider state and federal laws. When shares are issued to early-stage founders, the company generally relies on federal rule 4(a)(2) which has an exemption for issuances to those who organize and set up the company. At a state level, startups generally look for something similar to CA's rule 25102(f) limited offering exemption. When a startup creates an equity incentive plan, if the plan is set up properly (e.g., there are rules such as the shares in the plan can only go to natural people and cannot be issued to legal entities such as LLCs), the shares are exempt from registration under Rule 701, and then at the state level startups look for an exemption similar to CA's rule 25102(o).

    Finally, you're smart to be worrying about this now as you want to get all early insiders their shares BEFORE you take on any capital and it results in the price per share rising to the point that founders cannot purchase for a nominal price.



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:18

    Hi Alex, 

    My company is a pre-seed, founder funded, pharmaceutical company HQ in San Diego, incorporated in DE. I would like to use a pre-money SAFE with cap and discount for fundraising. Are there any recommended resources or contacts to use to help guide / inform valuation cap? I am using the great CARTA resource already - just curious if there are other options as well. Thank you for doing this! -Kurt 



    ------------------------------
    Kurt Harrington
    ------------------------------



  • 14.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:57

    Hi @Kurt Harrington

    I'll be in San Diego over the holidays. Feel free to hit me up at alex@archetypelegal.com if you're around and would like to grab a drink.

    See my recent post which I tagged you around the issues I've seen with offering both a discount and SAFE. As you see on YCs website, they've done away with a template that provides both, and my hunch is that is because it puts the founder in an awkward position of explaining where they are headed. If the money is merely to bridge to a large-priced round that is right around the corner, a discount is appropriate. However, if the priced round is likely a year or so away, a valuation cap is what investors will expect, and the discount should never come into play. 

    Besides the YC Primer, and Carta Resources, there is nothing that jumps as an online resocurce to mind to help guide the valuation cap. My high-level take is that unless investors are merely bridging you to a forthcoming priced round, they will expect the company to at least double in value (effectively resulting in a 50% discount). Therefore, if you're able to map out what you foresee as a likely value when you go for a Series A, you may want to set the cap between 30-70% below that. For example, if you'll raise on a $50m post-money valuation for a Series A, you may want to set your cap around $20m. Again, this is all just high level. A good resource for mapping out your financial trajectory is Ground Control. They can be reached at (www.comeingroundcontrol.com), or you can contact their founder, Chase Spenst at chase@comeingroundcontrol.com.



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 15.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:19

    Hi Alex,
    Knowing for significant raises, investors will (usually) expect the business to be a DE C-Corp.
    Are there implications for using SAFE's while still an LLC?  Is it more important to establish as a C-Corp for a priced round?
    Thanks!



    ------------------------------
    Tim Chalk
    ------------------------------



  • 16.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 12:03

    @Tim Chalk

    A couple of issues jump to mind. For one, the SAFE form is structured for C-Corps, so you'd have to revise it to confirm that conversion would only take place if/when the company converted to a corporation. The SAFE would also need to be transferred to the C-Corp as part of the conversion, resulting in extra paperwork. Additionally, you should speak to a CPA, but if you take SAFE money and then the company fails because an LLC is a pass-through entity, the owners of the LLC may have what is called "discharge of indebtedness income" because they took the funds, and never paid it back or converted it. Your CPA may say this is not of a concern, but because all of the profit and losses flow through to the owners of an LLC (not the case if you are a C-Corp as it has its own tax layer), I would want to ensure I knew what to expect under worst case scenarios. Finally, most incubators and/or large investors will not let you in or invest if you're an LLC, and you don't want to be in a position where you have to tell them to wait until you convert as they may lose interest. Most conversions require at least a couple of weeks to complete and can take longer if there are tax considerations you must deal with.

    -Alex

    alex@archetypelegal.com



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 17.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:20

    Hi Alex,

    I am a solopreneur, bootstrapping my startup and starting to get some traction.  It is hard to put a valuation since we are pre-revenue.  We need to raise funds so I have read up on SAFE and it appears to be a good option to raise initial funding.  Can you share your thoughts on SAFE? And how do we manage the raise to ensure we do not give away too much equity?



    ------------------------------
    Vik Sharma
    ------------------------------



  • 18.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 12:08

    Hi @Vik Sharma

    See my recent post in this thread about issues startups have when raising capital, as I address if a SAFE is even an intelligent vehicle to use. In short, it is a good option for the startup because it's startup-friendly (no interest, no maturity date, etc), but it may be less attractive to an investor. As for managing your raise and dilution, I recommend you consider contacting Ground Control (www.comeingroundcontrol.com or chase@comeingroundcontrol.com) as they can help you map out a pro forma based on where you plan to take your startup. At a high level, the post-money valuation cap SAFE is intended to simplify what dilution will look like. For example, if a startup sets a valuation cap of $10m and then raises $500k, that implies that right before the preferred price round, the $500k of SAFEs will convert into 5% of the company. If you can plot out the amount of money you'd raise with a SAFE and with a preferred stock priced round and at what valuations, you can start to see what your equity ownership will look like after a Series A. 



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 19.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 12:11

    @Alex King - Much appreciated.



    ------------------------------
    Vik Sharma
    ------------------------------



  • 20.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 12:23

    @Vik Sharma

    My pleasure!



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 21.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:20

    Hi Alex,

    I am issuing RSAs (thru an equity plan) without any vesting to a couple of consultants (not employees) and do not want them to have voting rights. Given that I have just one share class, and a couple of cofounders who own majority shares, how do I ensure that awarding RSAs will not grant the consultant any voting rights?



    ------------------------------
    Varun Poddar
    ------------------------------



  • 22.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 12:11

    @Varun Poddar

    The two options that jump to mind are (i) create a class of stock with no voting rights by amending your Certificate of Incorporation and then filling your EIP with those shares, or (ii) create a Voting Agreement and make the RSA grant contingent upon the recipients also join the voting agreement. For (ii) their shares still have voting rights, but they will have a contractual commitment to vote in a particular manner.

    -Alex

    alex@archetypelegal.com



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 23.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:33

    Hi Alex,

    I am the founder of a pre-revenue, pre-client SASS start-up which I am self-funding.  I have ~15 advisors to whom I would like to issue equity options.  The company was set-up as S corp in order to be capital efficient.  Since we would like to convert into a C-corp sometime in January so that the advisors and I can enjoy the benefit of QSBS eligibility (which requires C corp), the plan is for the options to be issued and almost all of my founder shares  to be issued after we convert into a C-corp.                                                                     

    Individuals who receive from the equity incentive plan typically receive stock options and must vest into those shares before they have the ability to buy those shares at the strike price set by the 409A valuation. If the 409A valuation is very low at the time of issuance, what are the tax implications and cost basis when the advisors exercise their options?   Since the vesting schedule is to vest 1/24 of the options every month for a 2 year period, does this mean that we need a new 409A valuation every time the advisors exercise their vest their options?

    ------------------------------
    Cristina Chen-Oster
    ------------------------------



  • 24.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 12:17

    @Huei-Jung Chen-Oster

    You're encouraged to speak to a tax professional regarding tax implications, but a few high-level thoughts. The cost basis should be the price they paid for the stock. Taxation will be influenced by whether the options are NSOs or ISOs. Generally speaking, NSOs are taxed on the difference between the strike price and the present-day FMV at the time of exercise as ordinary income. In contrast, ISOs are typically only taxed for alternative minimum tax considerations at the time of exercise. After that, both NSOs and ISOs which are exercised are taxed if the stock is liquidated, and the tax rate will depend on the holding period.

    You need a 409A every twelve months (expire 12 months after the valuation date), and 409As will expire before the 12 months if the company enters into a "material transaction" that will adjust the company's value (e.g., a term sheet for a Series A).  Thus, you need not obtain a new 409A every time an advisor exercises his/her shares. 

    -Alex

    alex@archetypelegal.com



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 25.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:38

    Hey Alex!  We're a startup with 2 business partners about to launch. One partner has invested significantly more money than the other partner, and is looking to adjust their shares based on this fact ($200K vs $35K).  What is the guidance on equity split here? How is this valued?   Thanks! 



    ------------------------------
    Sarah Katyal
    ------------------------------



  • 26.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 12:22

    @Sarah Katyal

    Absent the founders coming up with an agreed-upon formula, it is generally more art than science. For example, if the total value contributed is $235k, then if someone contributed $35k, he/she could agree to take 15% of the company ($35k / $235k). The reason it's more art than science is there are often factors, such as who originally came up with the startup idea, that influence why someone gets a larger stake.

    One option is to look into methodologies such as slicing the pie (https://slicingpie.com/). However, in my experience, if the founders cannot agree amongst themselves on what is fair, then having to involve systems such as slicing the pie to settle it can lead to long-term distrust and resentment. 

    -Alex

    alex@archetypelegal.com



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 27.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 11:50

    Hi everyone, before I get to the rest of the questions (I have a hard stop at 12:30, but I will do my best to address everyone's questions!!) I wanted to share what I prepared in advance of the chat. My feedback below may even address some questions people have. This is a list of key issues I see arise all of the time when raising capital. You probably have even more you could add, and I'd love to hear your feedback.

    1.     Cutting corners. This includes but is not limited to obtaining the necessary professional advice to lay the proper compliance, tax, financial, and legal framework to limit problem issues investors will point out during the due diligence phase of a capital raise. Dozens of times every year we have clients come to us who used online services and screwed up essential things during the formation stage. They then end up paying us 2-3x more than they would have paid had they worked with us from the beginning to resolve it as they're now under the gun to appease an investor.
     
    2.     Lack of a Data Room. Tied to #1 above is the failure to create an organized data room that holds all your files. A couple of solutions include services like Carta, but a hack we've come up with for our clients is to advise them to set up a company email that is dataroom@[startupname]. Then, whenever the company has signed contracts, scanned copies of corporate records, or financials, leadership can email it to the dataroom@ email and it should help prevent corporate records from slipping through the cracks. I had a CEO tell me he was up all night trying to close out a deal because he had to track down NDAs, signed employment agreements, confirmation of 83(b) elections, etc, that were required by the lead investor's counsel during due diligence. 
     
    If you're interested, feel free to reach out to me at alex@archetypelegal.com, and I'd be happy to share a sample due diligence request list so you can see topics investors will expect you to share in the data room.
     
    3.     Inability to Invest Enough Time. Raising capital can be a full-time job, and founders wear multiple hats. Finding an appropriate balance between product development, establishing the company culture, and making appropriate hires, all while also attempting to track down investment can be difficult. 
     
    4.     No Track Record. The founders have a great idea but no track record. You learn a lot when it's not your first rodeo, and that includes making meaningful connections to help open doors. You may find InPeak (www.inpeak.xyz/) to be a helpful resource for generating knowledge and connections. It's also helpful to align with advisors who can open doors for you.
     
    5.     An Inability to Tell a Story. When raising capital, you're a salesperson convincing investors why this is a good investment and where the company is going. For example, startup founders come to me often and say, "I'm going to raise money using a SAFE; should it be a discount SAFE, or a valuation cap SAFE, I see these are the two popular options". When this happens, I encourage them to take a step back and ask first if a SAFE is even an intelligent vehicle to use. 
     
    The SAFE form was created by YCominbator, which is thought to be a prestigious incubator. Therefore, if you're a startup that is graduating from the program, you're going to have a lot of investors interested in taking a chance on your startup. However, tied to #4 above, if you have no track record, a SAFE may be a tough sell as (i) it has no interest rate, and (ii) there is no majority date." Therefore, I would argue that unless you're a hot startup with many interested investors, you may want to use a convertible note to make your offering even more attractive with the interest rate and maturity date.
     
    Back to the original question of a discount versus a valuation cap, this ties back to your narrative and what you're selling. @Kurt Harrington, this may be related to what you're trying to do and the problems I see if trying to use a SAFE with BOTH a discount and a valuation cap.  If your pitch is that you are raising a bridge fund to float you until a large, fixed price round in the next 3-6 months, then a discount is appropriate. You're selling investors that you'll offer a discount as a thank you for investing a few months before the preferred stock round. However, if you're pitch is that you're doing a SAFE round now and then a larger round in 12-18 months, then unless the discount is huge, investors will expect their investment to offer a more significant return than 10-25% increase in value during a period in which the money was tied up in a SAFE and not earning any interest. They'll want to lock in a valuation cap to achieve a higher reward as an early investor who invested when the company was at its most risky state.
     
    Telling an appropriate story is tied to #1 above and having a good roster of professional advisors you can rely on, but it's also about putting your best foot forward when you have a chance to speak with investors. You may want to look into Potential.AI (www.potential.ai - @Rachel Weissman is a fellow member of the Carta Community) as a resource to help you tell your story.



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 28.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 12:27
    With our time almost up, I wanted to thank everyone who participated. Don't hesitate to contact me directly via email at alex@archetypelegal.com if I can ever be of service. I'll sign off with a couple of trends I'm seeing.
     
    1. The SAFE continues to be a popular form when a startup raises an initial seed round or to help bridge between an A, B, or C round. However, see my post about why it can be a bad idea to blindly use the SAFE if you need to make your offering attractive to investors.
    2. Lead investors of a preferred stock price round want the company to secure enough cash to last through at least Q2 of 2025, and they expect a business plan to make that a reality.
    3. AI, and clean energy continue to be popular industries that drive a lot of interest.
    4. Tied to #3, we're seeing investors become more comfortable with startups that are using their business not just to generate a return but as a force for good. The BCorp movement that incorporates a mission beyond profit continues gaining steam.
    5. If structured appropriately, we're seeing more startups get away with creating founders shares with 10x (or some other multiple) voting rights. Said another way, if structured appropriately in the charter documents, and if the circumstances for creating the 10x voting shares make sense to the investors, we're seeing less investors seek to unwind and reclassify those shares to standard 1x voting rights.
    Have a great rest of your day. If you posted just recently, apologies for not getting to your question, as I have a hard stop at 12:30. Cheers,



    ------------------------------
    Alex King
    ------------------------------



  • 29.  RE: Ask a Startup Lawyer Anything about Raising Capital

    Posted 11-16-2023 12:31

    A HUGE thank you to @Alex King for his time today! I loved to see so many great questions and answers here in this thread that will help these amazing founders and everyone else who is simply following this thread. Until next time! 



    ------------------------------
    Brent Devey
    Community Manager
    Carta
    Salt Lake City UT
    ------------------------------